About Volume IV

Twentieth Century Religious Thought: Volume IV, Eastern Religion currently includes more than 28,203 pages, comprising 110 books.

It is a scholarly, highly curated collection of key primary and secondary texts including foundational writings and contextual monographs:

  • From the late 19th century through the 21st century
  • Authors across a variety of backgrounds

It includes coverage of areas such as:

  • Philosophy of Religion
  • Spiritual Direction and Development
  • Deities
  • Metaphysics and Cosmology
  • Popular Devotions
  • Enlightenment

Future releases will provide more works from the key 20th century thinkers and more content in other languages, such as Tibetan and Sanskrit.

About the series/future volumes

Twentieth Century Religious Thought: Volume IV, Eastern Religions is the fourth in a four-volume series that includes Volume I: ChristianityVolume II: Islam, and Volume III: Judaism. Upon completion, it will include more than 500,000 pages of seminal texts.

Developed under the guidance of specialists in the field, the series provides a comprehensive and rare assemblage of important and unique materials, the essential works documenting religious thinking in the 20th century.

Key concepts and theories, such as ethics, truth, emptiness, doctrine, and reincarnation, will be explored and examined across religions, while specific dogmas and philosophies will also be studied in-depth. Students and scholars will experience the conversations within and among schools of thought through the key authors who have shaped the conversations and understandings.

The four volumes of Twentieth Century Religious Thought Library will constitute a major resource on all aspects of theological thought, dialogue, and experience across cultures, laying the foundation for historical and contemporary understandings.

Content suggestions

If you would like to recommend additional content for inclusion in the database, you can contact the editor at nduval@astreetpress.com

Sensitivity Statement and Takedown Policy

Materials contained on the Alexander Street platform include historical content that may contain offensive language, negative stereotypes or inaccurate representations. Alexander Street does not endorse the views expressed in such materials, but believes they should be made available in context to enable scholarly comparison, analysis and research.

In making material available online, Alexander Street and our content partners act in good faith. To the best of our knowledge, content contained within these collections has been cleared for publication by the appropriate rights holders and has not been placed under any restrictions for privacy, cultural or other sensitivities. If you have found material for which you believe you hold the copyright without proper attribution, which contravenes privacy laws, or which is a breach of the protocols determining accession provision for heritage materials which reflect indigenous history, culture, language or perspective, please contact us in writing at history@alexanderstreet.com. Please include with your query:

  1. Your full name
  2. Your contact information
  3. URL to the content in question
  4. The reason for your inquiry

Upon receipt of inquiries, the following steps will be undertaken:

  1. Inquirer will receive confirmation of receipt.
  2. Alexander Street will contact the holding source and/or any related copyright holder to notify of the inquiry.
  3. Alexander Street will make all possible efforts to resolve the takedown request quickly and to the satisfaction of all parties involved. Possible outcomes include: Access to content remains unchanged on the Alexander Street platform; Access to content is modified on the Alexander Street platform; Access to the content is removed from the Alexander Street platform.

Alexander Street strives to provide the broadest possible online access to content where permissions have been granted by the known rights holders and/or the content holding institution. Permanent access restrictions will be considered only as an exceptional response.